In this era of failed real estate projects, defaulting loans and creditors pursuing guaranties, a frequent inquiry is about the rights of creditors to reach a joint federal income tax refund due the debtor and his or her spouse. This is a very critical issue since so many debtors generated large net operating losses in 2008 which they can now carry back to prior years. Because these debtors paid substantial taxes in those prior years a refund, often substantial, is due the debtor and his spouse. The law will differ depending upon the debtor's state of residency but in Michigan once a joint federal income tax refund check is issued to husband and wife it will constitute an "evidence of indebtedness" and be protected from the creditors of just one spouse the same as entireties property. MCL557.151; Probert, 482 Mich. 858 (2008). But this is not the end of the story. What if the creditor garnishes the IRS prior to the IRS issuing the check--that is the garnishment is served after the return is filed and while it is being processed but prior to check issuance? In the case of Jahn v. Regan, 584 F. Supp. 399 (E.D.Mich. 1984), a tax overpayment that had not ripened into a refund check was not considered to fall within the ambit of MCL557.151 and therefore the debtor's interest in the overpayment was reachable by his separate creditors. Strategies exist to protect against this possibility but practitioners need to be aware of the issues and plan accordingly.
Contact Us
Subscribe
Topics
- Delaware Trusts
- Offshore Trusts
- Fraudulent Transfers (1)
Search
Recent Entries
Apr 7, 10 10:33 AM Asset Protection Planning Using Special Needs Trusts A client in financial distress is often searching for any possible opportunity for protecting assets...
Mar 13, 10 01:44 PM Using Loans As An Asset Protection Planning Technique Often a new client will contact me disclosing at our initial meeting significant pending creditor...
Feb 25, 10 02:17 PM Asset Protection Issues and the New Michigan Trust Code While the new Michigan Trust Code is effective April 1, 2010, it will apply to...
Feb 23, 10 10:47 AM Social Security Benefits--Safe From Creditors? Your Own Banker? The rule is simple. No creditor (other than the IRS) can seize your social security...
Feb 11, 10 09:13 AM Asset Protection for the Owner of Multiple Rental Homes I am meeting more and more clients who are in the business of acquiring,...
Nov 19, 09 09:14 AM Divorce--No Substitute for a Good Asset Protection Plan An Associated Press release on November 17, 2009 reported that the U.S. government could collect...
Monthly Archives
Legal Blogs
- Atlanta Business Attorney Blog (Meriwether & Tharp)
- Class Action Defense Blog (Michael Hassen)
- Atlanta Business Lawyer Blog (The Adams Law Offices)
- Michigan Criminal Attorney Blog (Draper Law Firm)
- Dennis Kennedy Blog (Dennis Kennedy)
- Michigan Collection Law Blog (Nitzkin & Associates)
- Special Assets Lawyer Blog (Dick Rogan)
- Hotel Law Blog (Jim Butler)
- Chicago Business Lawyer Blog (Jeremy A. Gibson)
- Alaska Law Blog (Atkinson, Conway & Gagnon)
- Oregon DUI Lawyer Blog (Andrew Elliott)
- inter alia (Tom Mighell)
- Massachusetts Lawyer Blog (Wilson & Whitaker)
- San Diego Business Lawyer Blog (Donald Oder)
- Louisiana Job Injury Law Blog (Charles E. Lavis)
- Oil and Gas Lawyer Blog (John McFarland)
- Michigan Business Litigation Lawyer Blog (Mantese Honigman Rossman and Williamson)
- Legal Marketing for Lawyers (Dave Lorenzo)